PDA

View Full Version : Where should the next Olympics be held?


M-50
04-08-2006, 02:27 PM
I want to know where you think they should be held. Should it be in Africa somewhere, India, MAlaysia, Japan, China, Korea, America, Germany, Holland, where?
I think that they should be in India. :headbang:

Stigmata
04-08-2006, 02:49 PM
There going to be held in London, it's already been confirmed.

dragoneyes001
04-08-2006, 06:20 PM
the following Olympics should be held on the moon:

this would have several benefits.

1) the location would have entire facilities built on it made for comfort and sports which are necessary for prolonged durations in space.
2) the travel to the moon would force the first world countries to speed up space travel for the Olympics including making it cheap enough for that many round trips needed for the athletes and construction crews.
3)the location would stop all these crappy opening ceremonies who rely on fireworks and crappy dance recitals combined to bore the audience to tears.
4) with all the travel back and forth to the moon the cost of travel there would become attainable to a huge percentage more people who would actually like to see space in their lifetimes.

5) terrorists would be harder pressed to attack the games themselves simply by how hard it'd be to get to the location.

6) since athletes are healthy they should be just fine with space travel needs.

7) records for jumping & lifting on the moon will be pretty much permanent records until the next moon Olympics.

8) it wont drop all the cost onto only one country.

jovine
04-08-2006, 06:50 PM
WOW...... moon-jumping will definitely break the record provided the guy don't drift off into space by accident! Thumbs up for cheap space travel ^^ the fireworks can be replaced by meteor showers Yeah I support Moon Olympics too!

Sarteck
04-08-2006, 09:14 PM
dragoneyes, I hate to say this, but... That actually makes a lot of sense, even if it's not a remote possibility. XD

M_Ghey
04-09-2006, 04:25 AM
lol, Dragoneyes, if you didn't provide all those reasons, it would seem stupid, but it actually makes sense. It woul;d cost billions to arrange, though.

akin_t
04-09-2006, 06:37 AM
the following Olympics should be held on the moon:
this would have several benefits.
1) the location would have entire facilities built on it made for comfort and sports which are necessary for prolonged durations in space.
2) the travel to the moon would force the first world countries to speed up space travel for the Olympics including making it cheap enough for that many round trips needed for the athletes and construction crews.
3)the location would stop all these crappy opening ceremonies who rely on fireworks and crappy dance recitals combined to bore the audience to tears.
4) with all the travel back and forth to the moon the cost of travel there would become attainable to a huge percentage more people who would actually like to see space in their lifetimes.
5) terrorists would be harder pressed to attack the games themselves simply by how hard it'd be to get to the location.
6) since athletes are healthy they should be just fine with space travel needs.
7) records for jumping & lifting on the moon will be pretty much permanent records until the next moon Olympics.
8) it wont drop all the cost onto only one country.


Haha, wow ... just wow.

I thought it was just plain satire, hate to admit it but it's actually quite logical; then again we're looking at ... how many? 100 ~ 200 years?