View Full Version : is it ok with u that teens have sex?
hamano_amon
08-20-2007, 09:26 AM
i just found a shocking that a teen sex it up with a cow...
http://www.metro.co.uk/weird/article.html?in_article_id=56126&in_page_id=2
which remind me of "the air sex thread",i don't understand,does people has to get fun from having sex?is it the only way to relax u n fuel u up?
n is it allright for teens to experience this to ease their pressure or wutever other reasons?
teens' love relationships r not exactly the same ones as adults',many of them even have no idea wut a "love" is.
and to allow teens to have sex's amount to allow them to have no love based sex relationship,to some extent.
wut's more,the pregnant problems,the diseases,the abortion rate...can also be more complicated than if they r love based or not.
does teen sex do good?wut do u think?
I think teenage sex is fine, as long as it's properly protected, by the woman using the pill and the man using a condom, and that they are both mature and love each other.
Mikado
08-20-2007, 06:20 PM
Nothing can stop love.
But if it is just desire, I'm against it.
If it's published I'm against it.
KT Samurai
08-20-2007, 10:19 PM
Nothing can stop love.
Pffbtbtbt!
Oh, excuse me. I just spat up my Gatorade. The idea of teenagers even comprehending what love is just made me laugh while I was drinking it.
Going along the same vein, but leaving out the "love" angle, you can't stop teenagers from having sex to begin with unless you castrate them or something. I don't think it's absurd to suggest that human beings are wired to become sexually active in their teens because of hormones and genetics because, back in the day, that was when we did a good amount of seed-spreading. We live a lot longer now, sure, but the genetics are still wired to "go off" at a certain instance in the duration of a given individuals lifespan. You've just gotta educate the poor kids, give them the means to have sex safely, and hope for the best.
Future
08-21-2007, 01:08 AM
I don't belive it's wrong, as long as they're both ready and are mature enough to have sex, then they can boink like bunnies all they want
KT Samurai
08-21-2007, 01:27 AM
I don't belive it's wrong, as long as they're both ready and are mature enough to have sex, then they can boink like bunnies all they want
Since when does maturity play a factor in fornication?
Be realistic here. I was "ready" to bang chicks the moment I realized my penis' other use. What exactly constitutes "ready" by your definition? Are you trying to touch on some kind of deep, psychological criteria that needs to be met or does there just need to be some lube nearby?
And, damn it, immature people have sex all the time. Forgive me for being so boggled by your conept of maturity playing a part here.
Future
08-21-2007, 01:32 AM
Since when does maturity play a factor in fornication?
Be realistic here. I was "ready" to bang chicks the moment I realized my penis' other use. What exactly constitutes "ready" by your definition? Are you trying to touch on some kind of deep, psychological criteria that needs to be met or does there just need to be some lube nearby?
And, damn it, immature people have sex all the time. Forgive me for being so boggled by your conept of maturity playing a part here.
i guess so, but those guys are idiots... and you're not "ready to bang chicks once you found out your penis had other uses" i mean as in, if they actually like each other and stuff... not just ****ing each other cause their "parts" work :S
KT Samurai
08-21-2007, 01:58 AM
i guess so, but those guys are idiots...
Well, yeah. But that doesn't stop them from getting what the want, now does it?
and you're not "ready to bang chicks once you found out your penis had other uses"
Yes. Yes, I was ready.
i mean as in, if they actually like each other and stuff... not just ****ing each other cause their "parts" work :S
That's cute and all, but not realistic.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that you're either a girl or a hopelessly pussy-whipped male. In either case, I'm not sure you could ever appreciate the revolutionary moment in every young man's life when he realizes that the weird swelling he's been getting lately can be alleviated by putting his penis inside a girl and that the whole process would feel damn amazing. Seriously, the moment he discovers this he's ready and willing to give it a hearty try.
Future
08-21-2007, 02:20 AM
I'm not saying that you can't go around ****ing random people, and i'm not a "hopelessly pussy-whipped male" <_< i just have some respect for women, and i would want to make sure they're ready, and that they're sure they wanna do it... i know that most males are willing to jump in the sack anytime... but most guys are descent and should wait for there partner
FullMetal Rebel
08-21-2007, 03:00 AM
No it isn't wrong.People were meant to start having sex at that age period anyway.Hell back in the day people got married as a teenager.
Anybody who thinks it is wrong,sorry but,you just don't know what you are talking about.
What is wrong is saying teens "aren't suppose to" have sex,because they aren't "ready".Pfft!When you start feeling those "urges" its damn right to have sex then.
And people expect teens to masturbate till "marriage".I laugh at those people.
bludd
08-22-2007, 02:15 AM
I agree teens should be able to have that decision of sex or not on their own, But I guess the reason people try to make it bad is because of all of the teen pregnancy and diseases. So when someone gave them protection and such they still didn't use it so now their using a different approach saying sex is dirty and wrong. As far as the fun sex thing yes I assume it would be fun, But with a cow I say that's just wrong.
Nothing wrong with having sex as a teens; lol that is how nature intended.
It's would be great if teens wore mature and ready for it, but realistically teens will have sex regardless of all that and hopefully they going to use protection.
Draffut
08-22-2007, 08:27 PM
is it ok with u that teens have sex?
No, because it's not with me.
Evil_Mirai
08-22-2007, 09:19 PM
Well as it was said... it's not like we can stop the teens having sex. You can't control them. However that cow part is... not a sign of a healthy mind. And mentioned love above is sure a funny thing. What love in this age? Of course, there are exceptions, but usually there is no love at all. They just think it is love.
JJAB91
09-01-2007, 02:31 AM
I think that is just wrong Dark Ruikia, theres nothing wrong with teens having sex as long as there protected and what KT said is way off what do you mean teens are un-able to fall in love? Anyone is I dont care what your age love is love and thats that.
No, I don't believe it's right, however, like most people said, it's not something that can be outlawed. It's highly unlikely that teens are responsible when they have sex, hence, so many high school dropouts because of unwanted pregnancy. Safe sex helps, but it isn't guaranteed.
I still remember biology honors class. We were talking about all the methods of safe sex. I was the only one with common sense and said, "How about just say 'no' to sex? Abstinence 100% guarantees that a girl will not get pregnant?" Of course, since I'm the only guy on the planet who is not a perverted hyena, I guess my method will never happen.
Vladimir
09-04-2007, 05:58 PM
i do not believe it's ok. i mean are you guys insane. teens are not as knowledgeable as they said to be. teenagers should NEVER have sex at that kind of age. they are not mature. think of what consequences. the female will get pregnant and KA BIISH all the future is gone. minus the thought of aborting. what would happen then? the female would get guilty all her life. and the male. less than 50% they will play their part. would they be a good husband and a good father at such a young age? sex is just not the word SEX. but it's your life now and then. what you do now, you will get later.
Undying
09-04-2007, 06:31 PM
Funny that everyone are saying "it's not ok" and "it shouldn't be".
Reality stands that teens (and I don't mean the 17-18 age group, who are mostly much more aware to methods of safe sex and do bother to check at the doctor's for this kind of thing. What I'm talking about are the 14-16 age group, who are mostly a bunch of horny idiots <_<) do have sex. You can't stop it. Sexuality is part of life, and the more teens are aware to it and the less society frowns upon it expands it.
Sure people like to say "back in the old days, no teenager had sex", but I think it'd bull. All teenagers are naturally inclined toward sex, just as adults. It's just that adults (meaning, not teen anymore - 20+) have different constraints and have less hormones in their body. Teenagers have a lot less problems like that (such as a permanent full-time job, kids of their own and stuff like that), so they can be more open about it (not to mention teens like to boast - "I banged her good" and other such boasts).
In short, this nearly-hilarious constant "it's not ok for teens to have sex" can be summed up with: if it's not ok, why is it they all want to do it?
FullMetal Rebel
09-12-2007, 10:58 PM
Funny that everyone are saying "it's not ok" and "it shouldn't be".
Reality stands that teens (and I don't mean the 17-18 age group, who are mostly much more aware to methods of safe sex and do bother to check at the doctor's for this kind of thing. What I'm talking about are the 14-16 age group, who are mostly a bunch of horny idiots <_<) do have sex. You can't stop it. Sexuality is part of life, and the more teens are aware to it and the less society frowns upon it expands it.
Sure people like to say "back in the old days, no teenager had sex", but I think it'd bull. All teenagers are naturally inclined toward sex, just as adults. It's just that adults (meaning, not teen anymore - 20+) have different constraints and have less hormones in their body. Teenagers have a lot less problems like that (such as a permanent full-time job, kids of their own and stuff like that), so they can be more open about it (not to mention teens like to boast - "I banged her good" and other such boasts).
In short, this nearly-hilarious constant "it's not ok for teens to have sex" can be summed up with: if it's not ok, why is it they all want to do it?
QFT!
I'll answer your last sentence. Its because they are MEANT to have sex at that time. If it isn't ok, then why weren't hermones activated till 20 years old?
I'll like anyone who disagrees to twist that.:)
Joe Black
09-16-2007, 10:54 PM
As a rebuttle, it is because of our inner desire to have early sex [prodominately if ur a man], that teenagers should remain abstinent until marriage.
For a man/woman to refuse the temptation not only prevent complications such as pregnancy or contraction of an STD, it strengthens the character of one's own self. To refuse having sex in your teens, in a society like this, shows great courage, maturity, and love for your partner.
Marriage is the foundation in which love is grown upon. Sex is not; it's a gift that marriage brings into a couple's life. It isn't easy to resist, but when the time is right, when you are happily married to the one you loved, you'll appreciate the fullness of the gift of human sexuality.
Undying
09-16-2007, 11:25 PM
As a rebuttle, it is because of our inner desire to have early sex [prodominately if ur a man], that teenagers should remain abstinent until marriage.
For a man/woman to refuse the temptation not only prevent complications such as pregnancy or contraction of an STD, it strengthens the character of one's own self. To refuse having sex in your teens, in a society like this, shows great courage, maturity, and love for your partner.
Marriage is the foundation in which love is grown upon. Sex is not; it's a gift that marriage brings into a couple's life. It isn't easy to resist, but when the time is right, when you are happily married to the one you loved, you'll appreciate the fullness of the gift of human sexuality.
Following that logic, all men must refrain from masturbating also, I suppose? Here's a simple test: take a child and raise him away from society. Then see what he does first: masturbates or eats the holy bread or whatever it's called.
Also by following that logic, we can say that after marriage, one can have as much sex as one wants, due to the fact that it's not sex that builds a relationship. Then why, oh why, do everyone hate cheating?
Because sex IS foundation of relationship. Whether you like it or not, the need to reproduce exists within everyone. It's part of us. We can't do much about it. The need to have sex is as natural as breathing.
Having sex eases tensions, is good for health, and all that silly stuff.
Also, despite what they say, most women want to have a man who can at least pleasure them. And you don't learn technique by staying away from it :rolleye09 .
Don't get me wrong - I'm not "for" or "against" sex as a teenager. I myself waited until after I was 18 to actually have sex with someone (and I don't care about her >_>, and she was supposed to be my girlfriend and all), but IMO every case should be viewed on a stand-alone basis. Most if not all teenagers have sex.
People think its wrong.
But everyone wants it.
You can't have something that was naturally created (whether by God or if you're an atheist by nature) and it's wrong.
Joe Black
09-17-2007, 12:10 AM
Following that logic, all men must refrain from masturbating also, I suppose? Here's a simple test: take a child and raise him away from society. Then see what he does first: masturbates or eats the holy bread or whatever it's called.
Masturbation is a perversion of the organ's intended purposes. Although it might be a primal aspect to those that aren't raised in society, it shouldn't approve of such a grotesque act among civilized beings; those that are educated to being proper, such as you or I. For example, just because murder and rape could be accepted in another society, doesn't necessarily approve the same conditions to exist in ours.
If you were also trying to imply a point that it is in our very natures that men do those acts, I will rebuttle that later.
Also by following that logic, we can say that after marriage, one can have as much sex as one wants, due to the fact that it's not sex that builds a relationship. Then why, oh why, do everyone hate cheating?
Because sex IS foundation of relationship.
I apologize for not elaborating on the point that sex should only involve a mature, married couple, fully capable of handling the complications that could arise.
Whether you like it or not, the need to reproduce exists within everyone. It's part of us. We can't do much about it. The need to have sex is as natural as breathing. Having sex eases tensions, is good for health, and all that silly stuff.
I am not dismissing the need to reproduce, or that it is in our natures that we desire sex. Sex is an extremely wonderful gift! I'm saying is that it is not necessary to have sex when it seems most 'convenient'. Fornication [except for those extremely rare cases] shows a complete lack of maturity, and displays no love for the other. Problems such as abortion and the increased rate of single parent families, arise from having sex at the wrong time.
As for you last sentence; you know what also eases tension, and good for your health? Going outside for a solitary walk; to breathe soothing fresh air, ponder about life, and get those legs moving. There are many stress relievers out there . . . like alchohal.
Also, despite what they say, most women want to have a man who can at least pleasure them. And you don't learn technique by staying away from it :rolleye09 .
It's called practice. If two people love each other enough, they will not make a decision to continue a relationship just on sex. Face it; all men suck their first time. [. . . that's not what i meant! XP]
People think its wrong.
But everyone wants it.
You can't have something that was naturally created (whether by God or if you're an atheist by nature) and it's wrong.
As a final statement; I am NOT saying that sex is wrong. If you believe in God, sex was naturally created in order to test our wills to refuse temptation, and bring ourselves to become better people. If you're an athiest, it was naturally created to make us suffer for some time in our lives.
P.S. The 'holy bread or whatever' is considered by many to be the body of the great Jesus Christ. Personally, I think it'd be better if you left him out of this debate.
the answer is simple. yes, but practice safe sex please! :p
cyberfields
09-17-2007, 03:18 AM
i support it... i see nothing wrong with it...
but i have been told i am going to hell sooo....
-=Yanayo=-
09-17-2007, 07:29 AM
i think teens haveing sex is fine
as long as they wait til there both ready
they dont do it because of peer pressure
they do it for love
teenagers CAN fall in love,, my exes parents were with each other since they were 14,, your telling me they didnt fall in love until they were adults because i doubt that and tbh iv been in love twice and im only 15 and i know what heartbreak feels like,, that or my insides were just haveing a random fit everytime they could or everytime i thought of my ex so yeah i think it should be allowed noone elses buisness really
Undying
09-17-2007, 08:34 AM
Masturbation is a perversion of the organ's intended purposes. Although it might be a primal aspect to those that aren't raised in society, it shouldn't approve of such a grotesque act among civilized beings; those that are educated to being proper, such as you or I. For example, just because murder and rape could be accepted in another society, doesn't necessarily approve the same conditions to exist in ours.
Read my example with "the holy bread or whatever" in my previous post. Masturbation is a natural act.
I apologize for not elaborating on the point that sex should only involve a mature, married couple, fully capable of handling the complications that could arise.
In other words, what you are saying is because teens are unaware of methods for safe sex and ignore it, they shouldn't have sex. With that I agree. No on should have sex until they are fully aware of the possible consequences and complications.
I am not dismissing the need to reproduce, or that it is in our natures that we desire sex. Sex is an extremely wonderful gift! I'm saying is that it is not necessary to have sex when it seems most 'convenient'. Fornication [except for those extremely rare cases] shows a complete lack of maturity, and displays no love for the other. Problems such as abortion and the increased rate of single parent families, arise from having sex at the wrong time.
Wrong. They occur because people do not have sex "in the wrong time", they occur because people are irresponsible and uneducated. Safe sex reduces those complications near enough to zero.
Sex as a teen is not much different than masturbation; they do it because their body demands it on a very basic level.
As for you last sentence; you know what also eases tension, and good for your health? Going outside for a solitary walk; to breathe soothing fresh air, ponder about life, and get those legs moving. There are many stress relievers out there . . . like alchohal.
Alcohol is bad, as opposed to safe sex. If you drink too much alcohol, you know what happens... we've seen enough of those. I haven't seen anyone die from having safe sex yet :rolleye09
It's called practice. If two people love each other enough, they will not make a decision to continue a relationship just on sex. Face it; all men suck their first time. [. . . that's not what i meant! XP]
True indeed, and I'm not arguing with that. But good sex is also part of a healthy relationship, just like kissing, talking (communication) and everything else.
As a final statement; I am NOT saying that sex is wrong. If you believe in God, sex was naturally created in order to test our wills to refuse temptation,
That's according to Christianity. In Judaism (and forget for a moment all the bull that's surrounding it because "the wise-men have decreed) sex is very encouraged - even during pregnancy. Sex is part of a relationship. If you ignore it, it's the same as ignoring other parts of a relationship: communication, sharing, etc. It's just that it's that much harder for men to forget about it.
and bring ourselves to become better people. If you're an athiest, it was naturally created to make us suffer for some time in our lives.
I believe in God... only I'm a Jew, so I don't believe 99% of the things in the world are created to test our temptation resistance. Ignoring sex won't make you a better person. It will make you an impotent person.
P.S. The 'holy bread or whatever' is considered by many to be the body of the great Jesus Christ. Personally, I think it'd be better if you left him out of this debate.
You missed the whole point... understandable. I'm not talking about its meanings or religious implications. My example states that a child raised away from sex-encouraging society (i.e., away from "temptation") would still be more inclined to have sex (if he's not impotent) than to do the "holy" (as quite a bit of the world believes) thing.
Rayster
09-17-2007, 09:10 AM
In short, this nearly-hilarious constant "it's not ok for teens to have sex" can be summed up with: if it's not ok, why is it they all want to do it?
Biological drive. The primal need to pass on your genes
Undying
09-17-2007, 09:40 AM
Biological drive. The primal need to pass on your genes
And that drive is wrong? :whatevah:
Rayster
09-17-2007, 09:44 AM
Who said it was wrong? o_O Your question was why do they want to do it, even tho its wrong.
btw, in regard to a few posters: the question is not "is it right for teens to have sex" but is it right with you that teens have sex. Own values = own judgements. There's no logic here, except the core facts such as risk of STD, not being able to look after new life that is depended upon you if you're just a kid, etc etc
Undying
09-17-2007, 09:46 AM
Who said it was wrong?
My point exactly
btw, in regard to a few posters: the question is not "is it right for teens to have sex" but is it right with you that teens have sex. Own values = own judgements. There's no logic here, except the core facts such as risk of STD, not being able to look after new life that is depended upon you if you're just a kid, etc etc
Listen to this man, for he speaks the truth.
Biological drive. The primal need to pass on your genes
That's okay with animals, but not with rational beings like humans. However, It's true that all that sexual desire/attraction to the opposite sex (in most of the cases) has to do with our hormone production.
In our society, those impulses are nothing but an annoyance. You can't have sex with somebody just because you like him/her. It's pretty hard to control those impulses.
For teenagers, that control is even harder because their hormone production levels are much higher than an adults' levels.
Is it okay for them to have sex? Of course it is. I would even recommend it. It's healthy, reduces stress and it's a way to avoid future genital-related problems (not always take place).
However, they must use condoms/DIU/spermicides... It's not only a way to prevent diseases but also a way to avoid unwanted pregnancies.
There may be people who don't like the idea of teenagers having sex because of their religion/culture/whatever. However, most of people without those religion/culture bonds who reject sex between teenagers, say no because of the risks (AIDS, syphilis...).
Rayster
09-17-2007, 02:20 PM
That's okay with animals, but not with rational beings like humans.
Yes it is. I don't even have to say why because you did
It's pretty hard to control those impulses.
They're biological impulses. Humans are animals. Just because we can think "rationally" doesn't mean the drive doesn't exist, just that we ought to control it.
Which is my stance. Control.
Honestly I think it is up to the person's discretion to decide whether or not to have sex. However, that being said I think that it is paramount to obey the age restriction on having sex. It's there for a reason, not necessarily moral. Moral assumptions aside, it is there to protect those whose bodies are still developing. Having underage sex can have reprecussions on the development of reproductive organs, especially in females. The age is there for a reason.
Tyekanik
09-17-2007, 02:53 PM
I have absolutely no problem with a teen who is having sex and properly prepared, funded (by their own means, not my damn taxes), enough time and basically at a point in life where they could be the parent any child deserves.
As I've only seen the after school parent who can't work lest they never ever see their own child, I disagree with teenage sex because of this. Work and school can be swapped but still, same basic scenario. Regardless of the worst case scenario's (pregnancy, hot chicks can't have diseases:rolleye09) likelihood, I view it as if something is 99 % percent effective then you could also plan on one of those 100 being a pregnancy. It's within expected margins after all.
The mindset that 'its between us' is absolutely naive. Not even sex is constrained to the individuals participating, consequences effect other people in everything done - ^^I just used a child as a consequence of someone previously uninvolved becoming so.
Sirius
11-15-2007, 05:35 PM
Personally I matured very quickly during high school and it angered me whenever somebody told me 'I wasn't mature enough to do something until I was 18, or 21.' I would take one look at the 20 year olds I knew and realize there was little difference between them and me.
Not all teenagers mentally mature at the same rate. I believe the answer is it depends on the individual teenagers. All sex is a risk, and that risk does not magically become any less risky in adulthood. As long as a teenager is mature enough to understand the risks involved and chooses to practice safe sex I say full speed ahead.
In fact there are 20 year olds who have unprotected sex with random people who are, in my opinion, less mentally ready to engage in sex than a smart 17 year who uses protection.
My argument only holds true for older teenagers whose bodies are developed...
SaberBlade
11-18-2007, 10:36 AM
I know girls who've had kids and been abandoned by their so called boyfriend after he had sex with her. I know another girl who is currently pregnant and her boyfriend said he wants nothing to do with her now.
These girls aren't young, they are about 19 yet the boys they were with are supposed to be wiser, smarter and more responsible than younger boys. So is it alright with me that teens have sex? **** no. I know a lot of you won't like hearing this because I do know there are a lot of teens on this site, but in truth, you are all ******* idiots.
Biological drive? love? Ha, bullshit.
It's a not a biological drive or love when a guy will pretend to be your friend, say sweet words into your ear and lie directly to your face just to get into your panties. Let's not forget that once he does, girls will get the cold shoulder and he'll move on to his target. Congratuations, that girl has just became the latest story he can tell his friends and make to feel like shit because he's moving on and going to ignore her.
Someone did say love, and to be honest loving making is one of the best things in the world when you're in love but teens have no concept of love. I'm 24, at times even I have trouble with it. If a guy thinks a girl has fallen for his charms and in love him, then that makes her much more easy to manipulate especially when says those three special words, i'll pull out. Yeah, i'm feeling the love with that one.
Who do you think actually came up with excuses like "you can't get pregnant on your period", "you can't get pregnant if it's your first time" or "i'll pull out"? I know that scientists didn't come up with those, so my bet would be men. Go to Yahoo Answers, and do a search for "sex pulling out" and you'll get near 7000 results the majority of which is women asking if they can be pregnant because their boyfriend or fiancee pulled out.
See, ******* stupid. We can send a man to the moon, replace a persons heart and every day science is evolving and working to cure diseases like cancer yet people are still dumb enough to believe that pulling out actually works. How can people be that stupid.
We are living in a world where STD's are easier to catch than the cold. We're living in a world where kids are being taken advantage of in some regions of the world because their 13 and it's a biological drive so their being married of to some 40 year old to have his kids. Teens need to be properly taught the dangers of sex, not just the birds and the bee's crap and the biology behind birth.
People are always very arogant about things never happening to them. This isn't just teens but I mean everyone. If a person thinks something won't happen to them then they'll do it and when it comes to sex, people don't fear STD's like they should because out of some unfounded belief that they can't get catch one yet chances are that person is Typhoid Mary.
On top of that, who has the most to lose from unprotected sex?
Answer: women.
You really think that if a guy gets pregnant he will stick around? Hell no. He will move on to his next conquest and the woman is stuck with a life changing choice. Abort the child (if it's legal where you live) and suffer through what could be a great deal amount of guilt and sorrow because you got pregnant and had to kill the pregnancy, or have the child and give up all your plans for live. Even if you give the child up for adoption, you'll still have that whole in your heart because you had to give your child away just to carry on with your life.
Where is the guy during all of this, trying to **** her best friend and doing the same thing all over again because hey, if it worked once it's got work again right.
If two teenagers believe they love each, concent to sex because it's what they want and both are equally prepared, having both taken precaution and are having sex to express their feelings for each other (instead of the guy being a manipulative cunt) then good for them. I wish the the best and I hope they are prepared for the future.
But people aren't like that. Guys want one thing, will do anything for that thing and will go as far as to ruin womens lives for it.
----
Here are things to think about, and no one needs to answer.
Guys/Girls: How many of you have sex with multiple people and not been tested for an STD?
Guys: How many of you have said I love you just to get sex?
Girls: How many of you met the sweetest guy, he said he loved you but ****** off once you had sex with him?
Guys: How many have said stuff like you'll pull out, you can't get pregnant if you're a virgin or can't get pregnant if you're on your period?
Girls: How many of you have guys say that to you?
---
Seriously, I would be very surprised if everyone who has posted or new people who will post can honestly say (both guys and girls who are sexually active) that those questions have nothing to do with them. It's never happened or if they can honestly say they've never heard any of them happen to people they know.
--
I think I went of on a very big rant here.
Laika
11-18-2007, 11:21 PM
Saberblade, you are obviously a very hateful and secluded individual. If you think that teenagers do not experience love then your teenage years must have been very, very sad.
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.